Posted in Banking & Financial Services, Total Reads: 676
SWOT Analysis of Babcock & Brown with USP, Competition, STP (Segmentation, Targeting, Positioning) - Marketing Analysis
Babcock & Brown
Babcock & Brown
Investment & Advisory firm
Best known in financial markets for structural finance deals
Retail and corporate investors
Firms in real estate, power, transport and other sectors and PPP including retail investors
Specialized financial advisor and funds manager
1. At its peak before liquidation, the company had 25+ offices and over 1500 employees worldwide 2. Market capitalization peaked at above $9 billion during its period of operation 3. Company’s substantial revenue was generated from Public-Private partnerships (PPP) projects 4. It was regarded as the market leader in US and UK in its structural finance advisory business which generated significant share of company’s net revenue
1. The company’s balance sheet was stuffed with long term illiquid assets financed by short term debt 2.Fears about the debt levels of the firm and its various satellite funds reduced the share price
1. The company’s main target market was the real estate sector which was enjoying considerable success in Sydney during its peak operation period 2. Investors were attracted by the salary of firm’s CEO which got hyped in the market to a considerable extent
1. Share price collapsed by 2008 representing market capitalization of less than $50 million 2. The failure to meet interest payments resulted in the insolvency of the bank
Browse marketing analysis of more brands and companies similar to Babcock & Brown. The BrandGuide section covers SWOT Analysis, USP, STP & Competition of more than 6000 brands from over 20 categories.
The brand names and other brand information used in the BrandGuide section are properties of their respective companies. The companies are not associated with MBASkool in any way. The brand names are used purely for educational/academic purpose only. Utmost care has been taken in the analysis of the brands. However, if you find any ambiguity kindly help us improve.