Laird PLC SWOT Analysis, USP & Competitors

Posted in Consumer Electronics, Total Reads: 621
Advertisements

SWOT Analysis of Laird PLC with USP, Competition, STP (Segmentation, Targeting, Positioning) - Marketing Analysis

Laird PLC

Parent Company

Laird Group PLC

Category

Electronics

Sector

Retail

Tagline/ Slogan

Smart Technology. Delivered

USP

Technology for a Connected World

STP

Segment

Enterprises looking for services related to electronics

Target Group

Organizations working across sectors

Positioning

They are focused on providing components and solutions that protect electronic devices from electromagnetic interference and heat, and that enables connectivity through wireless applications and antennae systems

SWOT Analysis

Strengths

1. Strong brand and image heritage in the UK
2. Robust knowledge of all electronics & technology industries
3. Presence at multiple locations
4. Continuous commitment towards innovation

5. It is a part of the FTSE 250 Index

6. Acquisition of other international companies have strengthened its market position

Weaknesses

1. Multiple ventures in different industry before current segment 
2. Constant innovation means high R&D and hence huge investments & restricted margins

Opportunities

1.Coming out with more cost effective solutions
2.Moving operations to more verticals
3.Establishing foothold in Africa and Asia

Threats

1. R&D Intensive industry requires proper attention
2. Disruptive innovations in the industry
3.Following guidelines established in the industry

Competition

Competitors

1. W.L. Gore  & Associates, Inc.
2.Doncasters Group Ltd.



Advertisements



Looking for More Brands? Search BrandGuide

Edit the Brand or Add a New One : Contribute to BrandGuide

The brandnames and other brand information used in the brandguide section are properties of their respective companies. The companies are not associated with MBASkool in any way. The brand names are used purely for educational/academic purpose only.
Utmost Care has been taken in the analysis of the brands. However, if you find any ambiguity kindly help us improve.