Apple iPad Mini SWOT Analysis, USP & Competitors

Posted in Consumer Electronics, Total Reads: 616
Advertisements

SWOT Analysis of Apple iPad Mini with USP, Competition, STP (Segmentation, Targeting, Positioning) - Marketing Analysis

Apple iPad Mini

Parent Company

Apple

Category

Tablets

Sector

Telecommunication

Tagline/ Slogan

“The whole package. In a smaller package”

USP

Retina Display Screen and smaller screen size

STP

Segment

Classy and Smart Tablet

Target Group

High end people , previous Apple users

Positioning

Apple’s first one-handed tablet

SWOT Analysis

Strengths

1. Display of 7.87 Inches with Retina display of 264 PPI offers better utility than iPad(9.7)

3. Apple brand legacy and experience

4. Operating System iOS is a strength

5. All capabilities of regular iPad but with a smaller screen

6. People looking more more comfortable size to carry along prefer iPad Mini

7. Excellent battery life, even while gaming and other heavy usage

Weaknesses

1. Screen Density is less than regular iPad

2. Smaller screen can be a disadvantage for people using ipad more for typing, working, editing etc

Opportunities

1. Can be positioned different from regular iPad

2. Standard tablet, with not much additions from previous version, could work on improving that

3. Specific features custom made for iPad Mini can make it stand out than regular iPad(e.g. in iPad Pro apple has introduced pencil which makes it different from iPad Air)

Threats

1. Misses out on iPad Air’s great processor and specs

2. Similar design and looks to previous versions

Competition

Competitors

1. Nexus 9
2. Apple iPad 2
3. Samsung Galaxy Tab 4



Advertisements



Looking for More Brands? Search BrandGuide

Edit the Brand or Add a New One : Contribute to BrandGuide

The brandnames and other brand information used in the brandguide section are properties of their respective companies. The companies are not associated with MBASkool in any way. The brand names are used purely for educational/academic purpose only.
Utmost Care has been taken in the analysis of the brands. However, if you find any ambiguity kindly help us improve.