Torrent Power SWOT Analysis, USP & Competitors

Posted in Energy, Total Reads: 2299
Advertisements

SWOT Analysis of Torrent Power with USP, Competition, STP (Segmentation, Targeting, Positioning) - Marketing Analysis

Torrent Power

Parent Company

Torrent Group

Category

Power

Sector

Energy

Tagline/ Slogan

Transforming Life

USP

An experienced group in Financing projects

STP

Segment

Retail and commercial customers looking for power

Target Group

Industries, residential complexes, commercial complexes

Positioning

Efficient and Reliable

SWOT Analysis

Strengths

1. Successful in Private distribution franchisee business
2. Very low debt to equity ratio thus minimizing exposure to risk

3.High efficiency of generation and also of transmission and distribution(T&D)

4. Integrated across the value chain – Generation, Transmission and Distribution

5. Good presence in Maharashtra, Gujarat and UP

Weaknesses

1.Presence restricted to few states

2.Unlike major players, Torrent Power does not possess sources of coal or oil and hence incapable of doing Backward Integration.

Opportunities

1. Huge scope in the private power sector and scope to enter new markets in India
2. Scope to expand its franchisee business

3. Scope to enter the T&D business in other states

Threats

1.Cannot compete with bigger players due to absence of economies of scale

2.May face opposition from local State Electric Boards

3.Delays in transportation of imported gas and also delay in the KG-D6 basin gas project may have a negative impact – may create shortages

Competition

Competitors

1.Reliance Power
2.Adani Power
3.NTPC

4.Tata Power 



Advertisements



Looking for More Brands? Search BrandGuide

Edit the Brand or Add a New One : Contribute to BrandGuide

The brandnames and other brand information used in the brandguide section are properties of their respective companies. The companies are not associated with MBASkool in any way. The brand names are used purely for educational/academic purpose only.
Utmost Care has been taken in the analysis of the brands. However, if you find any ambiguity kindly help us improve.