Pepco Holdings SWOT Analysis, USP & Competitors

Posted in Energy, Total Reads: 708
Advertisements

SWOT Analysis of Pepco Holdings with USP, Competition, STP (Segmentation, Targeting, Positioning) - Marketing Analysis

Pepco Holdings

Parent Company

Pepco Holdings Inc.

Category

Electric Utilities

Sector

Energy

Tagline/ Slogan

-

USP

A Leading power company in the Mid- Atlantic States in the U.S.

STP

Segment

Electric utilities and solutions for organizations and companies

Target Group

Residential, Small and Large Businesses

Positioning

Leading American Power company

SWOT Analysis

Strengths

1. Has a generating capacity of about 5000 MW – most of which is oil and gas fired

2. Has a team of over 5500 employees and serves over 1.9 million customers.

3. Is a vertically integrated company – is involved in generation, transmission and distribution of power

4. Features in the Fortune 500 list of companies.

5. Good reputation and strong operations

Weaknesses

1. Criticized for spending on lobbying and for evasion of taxes.

2. Experiencing a fall in revenues and operating profit is a concern

Opportunities

1.Can enter other States in the U.S and even in other countries like Canada

2. Can expand into renewable power – currently it has just 1 MW of Wind power in its renewable power portfolio

3. Power demand in the U.S. is high

Threats

1. Consolidation in the power sector in the U.S.

2.Price wars would lead to fall in prices and fall in profits

3. Rise in international prices of oil

Competition

Competitors

1.Duke Energy
2.North Eastern Utilities
3.Public Power



Advertisements



Looking for More Brands? Search BrandGuide

Edit the Brand or Add a New One : Contribute to BrandGuide

The brandnames and other brand information used in the brandguide section are properties of their respective companies. The companies are not associated with MBASkool in any way. The brand names are used purely for educational/academic purpose only.
Utmost Care has been taken in the analysis of the brands. However, if you find any ambiguity kindly help us improve.