Bottling Group LLC SWOT Analysis, USP & Competitors

Posted in Food & Beverages, Total Reads: 586

SWOT Analysis of Bottling Group LLC with USP, Competition, STP (Segmentation, Targeting, Positioning) - Marketing Analysis

‘Bottling Group LLC’

Parent Company

Pepsi Bottling Group




Food and Beverages

Tagline/ Slogan



A subsidiary of Pepsi’s biggest bottlers



Any company which manufactures ready to consume beverages in convenience packaging

Target Group

Products of PepsiCo as well as any other companies they have alliances with


High quality efficient bottling services at competitive costs

SWOT Analysis


1. Association with one of the biggest beverage brands in the world
2. Ability to produce brands of partners of Pepsi reduces the risk involved
3. Affiliation with Pepsi Beverages Company will add to its brand value
4. Extensive distribution network


1. Lack of scale of the company as compared to some of its competitors
2. Lack of ability to diversify and take on new customers on its own
3. Low bargaining power with the customers due to presence of large number of players in the market


1. To adopt and imbibe the latest technological innovations in packaging
2. Leverage the brand name of Pepsi to develop a strong reputation in the market
3. To form a union among different bottlers to increase the total bargaining power within the industry


1. Emergence of fountain and other types of colas
2. The ‘squeezing’ of margins for the bottler from both the consumer and customers side
3. The constant innovation in packaging mechanisms requires high reinvestments



1. PepsiAmericas
2. Coca Cola Bottling Co.



Looking for More Brands? Search BrandGuide

Edit the Brand or Add a New One : Contribute to BrandGuide

The brandnames and other brand information used in the brandguide section are properties of their respective companies. The companies are not associated with MBASkool in any way. The brand names are used purely for educational/academic purpose only.
Utmost Care has been taken in the analysis of the brands. However, if you find any ambiguity kindly help us improve.