Affirming the Consequent

Posted in Statistics, Total Reads: 2629
Advertisements

Definition: Affirming the Consequent

Affirming the Consequent is a logical fallacy (error) where the converse statement is inferred as true from a logical statement. This kind of argument is invalid. This fallacy is also known as Converse error or fallacy of the converse.


Example:

Consequent: The part of a conditional statement whose truth is conditional. (Generally followed by then)

Antecedent:  The part of conditional statement which precedes the Consequent


If statement P [ANTECEDENT], then statement Q [CONSEQUENT]


As per the converse error, Q is true then necessarily P also has to be true. (Which does not follow logically?). In fact, the only inference that can be made is: If non-Q, then non-P.


Statement: If I am Rich, I have a car

Converse error: If I have a car, means I am rich

Logic: I can have car even if I am not rich. There are a hundred ways to have a car. Being rich is just one of the ways to have a car

Correct Conclusion: If I don’t have a car, I am not rich

 

Hence, this concludes the definition of Affirming the Consequent along with its overview.

Advertisements

Browse the definition and meaning of more terms similar to Affirming the Consequent. The Management Dictionary covers over 7000 business concepts from 6 categories.

Search & Explore : Management Dictionary



Share this Page on: