Keurig Green Mountain SWOT Analysis, USP & Competitors

Posted in FMCG, Total Reads: 1447

SWOT Analysis of Keurig Green Mountain with USP, Competition, STP (Segmentation, Targeting, Positioning) - Marketing Analysis

Keurig Green Mountain

Parent Company

Keurig Green Mountain, Inc. (GMCR)


Coffee FMCG


Food and Beverage

Tagline/ Slogan

Brew a better day


400 different varieties of coffee and other beverage selections



Commercial and Home

Target Group

Business owners, young busy professionals


A reason to get together and make every glass a special occasion

SWOT Analysis


1. Strong partnership support
2. Strong brand equity as it was known as Green Mountain Coffee earlier

3. More than 400 coffee and beverage options at offer

4. Company image is built on sustainability initiatives which is included in their operations and supply chain related activities

5. Over 6000 people are in the workforce

6. Strong acquisitions have enabled the brand to grow

7. Significant CSR activities have added to the brand value and loyalty


1. Dependence on a single China-based manufacturer for single cup brewers
2. Dependence on a few big retailers for a considerable chunk of revenue can be a concern


1. Expand in overseas market
2. Extension into functional drinks market
3. Expansion into other related verticals like ice creams and energy drinks


1. On-the-go coffee shops
2. Price of unroasted coffee beans can fluctuate widely in agri-trading markets

3. Intense competition means low brand loyalty



1. Maxwell House
2. Starbucks

3. Eight O’Clock Coffee

4. Dunkin’ Donuts

5. Folgers


Looking for More Brands? Search BrandGuide

Edit the Brand or Add a New One : Contribute to BrandGuide

The brandnames and other brand information used in the brandguide section are properties of their respective companies. The companies are not associated with MBASkool in any way. The brand names are used purely for educational/academic purpose only.
Utmost Care has been taken in the analysis of the brands. However, if you find any ambiguity kindly help us improve.